Soon to come – for more information call Frank Howell at (662) 686-3366

An Analysis by David Lush:
Primary elections showed what’s wrong with the system



If there’s one thing the August 5 primary elections showed to the voting public in the Mississippi Delta, is that something is amiss with the way the election was conducted by those who should know better.

Election and voting snafus were reported throughout the state but few places could compare with some of what went on in the central part of the Delta.

Particularly disturbing to many were the outright misinterpretations of election procedures and the misapplication of election law, which thwarted some from voting or voting the way they wanted to.

And if you are a Republican, you were more than likely treated quite badly if allowed to vote at all since Democratic poll workers controlled what went on in most precincts, particularly in Bolivar County. Also disturbing to many voters and Republican officials in Bolivar County was the outright refusal of personnel in the Bolivar County Circuit Clerk’s office to abide by the election law and provide voter rolls as allowed for in state statutes.

What appeared to be most obvious was that voter rolls were not up-to-date before the primary election causing many to vote by affidavit ballot even though they’ve been voting for many years.

The endless problems in many precincts with the primary election created chaos, confusion and resentment with voters, candidates and election officials — especially in precincts where an organized group that also ran the voting mechanisms specifically targeted certain candidates.

Numerous examples of primary election day problems have been received by the Delta Business Journal and verified through interviews and documented statements by affected parties.

However, circuit clerks in Bolivar, Washington and Sunflower counties did not return phone calls prior to press time to comment on specific election problems and issues in their respective counties.

One staff person in the Sunflower County Circuit Clerk’s office, who would not identify herself, did say, “we did experience some problems Election Day but the problems were not out of the ordinary that one would expect. They were handled as they were reported.” Some of the more blatant problems in the Bolivar County primary election, which have been verified, included the following:

• Voting machines in the county were to have been set up to vote either Democrat or Republican. There were not separate machines for each party. When a voter declared at the polls what party the voter wanted to vote for, the election worker switched a lever according to the voters’ preference — which should have locked out the other party.
However, almost all 59 of the county’s voting machines were set up incorrectly which allowed a voter to cross-vote.

Sign-in sheets in many precincts revealed the problems especially on the Republican side where there was one number showing where people signed in as Republicans but more people appeared to have voted Republican on the official precinct tally sheet.

• The Mississippi Election Code requires that candidate’s names in a primary should be listed in alphabetical order. In some instances, this was not done

• In Supervisor District 5, the incumbent’s name was not on the ballot in one precinct prior to the start of voting. The matter was corrected before voting but the over sight was obvious. This was also a problem in at least three precincts in Washington County affecting supervisor candidates.

• Printer packs in voting machines were not aligned properly and were not easily readable by poll workers during the election certification process.

• Poll workers were providing too much assistance to voters in the voting booth without the voter asking for the assistance. Election statutes are very clear as to when a poll worker can provide assistance. And in some cases, the poll worker was pulling the lever for the voter.

• The names of over 200 Delta State University students, who signed up to vote during a voter registration drive, were not on the county’s official voter rolls on primary election day. The names were turned into the Bolivar County Circuit Clerk’s office well ahead of the 30-day deadline to submit such names but were not entered into the computer thus causing many to vote by affidavit ballot.

• Officials with the Haley Barbour for Governor Campaign were denied a copy of Bolivar County’s voter rolls despite campaign statutes allowing for such a request.

The circuit clerk’s office refused several requests by the campaign staff for access to the voter rolls even though the request was made in the appropriate time period and in accordance with state statues. Barbour campaign officials obtained copies of both Washington and Sunflower county voter rolls with no problem, yet could not obtain Bolivar County’s rolls.

• The county’s voter rolls still list people who have deceased or moved away and, in a number of cases, voters have been deceased for many years. Deceased names provided to the circuit clerk’s office from the state are not entered into the computer to update the voter rolls on a timely basis. The number of affidavit ballots is an indication as to the state and condition of the voter rolls.

• People assigned to work for the Republican Party as poll workers were later told, when they arrived at the precinct, that they had to work for the Democratic Party.

• Voters in some precincts, with addresses outside the county, were allowed to vote by poll workers.

• Relatives of some candidates were allowed by poll workers to assist voters in voting and actually going in the voting booth to do so.

• Many eye witnesses reported seeing people paying voters outside the Rosedale Court House to vote a certain way on Election Day.

• Certain election officials in Washington County were telling some voters on the steps of the Washington County courthouse that it was not fair to vote for the other party.

• Voters in both Washington and Bolivar counties reported to county and state officials about being harassed by precinct workers in the voting process.

One Leland voter, who was harassed, even contacted the Mississippi Secretary of State’s office and the Mississippi Attorney General’s office to complain on Election Day.

These examples are only the tip of the onfusing election iceberg. Outdated voter rolls, selective application of election laws, refusal by election officials to follow the law and intentional harassment of voters has made this primary election one to remember.

But that’s what some thought following previous county elections over the past 10 years when federal poll watchers had to come into certain precincts in the county to assure things were done right.

This election, however, the U.S. Department of Justice declined to send federal poll watchers to Bolivar County despite a request by the Bolivar County Board of Supervisors.
As the November general election approaches, eyes are focused on what will happen next with county voter rolls and the actions of election officials.

One bright spot on the horizon is a soon-to-be organized county voters watchdog group who may go to court to force the county to clean up the voter rolls.

They feel this is what it will take to get the dead people off the voter rolls so they can’t continue to vote in county elections, or those who live out of state—like Anaheim, Calif.—who have found a place to vote here? It will certainly be unfortunate that it will come to a court challenge to get those responsible for fair, honest elections in the county to do what they’re already being paid to do. DBJ


Stock Quotes
Dow (^DJI)
·Last trade: 11632.38 -
·Change: +29.88 (0.26)

Nasdaq (^IXIC)
·Last trade: 2325.88 -
·Change: +21.92 (0.95)

S&P 500 (^GSPC)
·Last trade: 1282.19 -
·Change: +5.19 (0.41)

Get Chart: 

Symbol Lookup

 

Delta Business Journal
P.O. Box 117 • 125 South Court Street • Cleveland, MS 38732
Tel: (662) 843-2700• Fax: (662) 843-0505
© 2004, Coopwood Publishing Group, Inc.

ggg